<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the fuel economy going to be in a &#8216;67 Camaro?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: racer123</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link> <dc:creator>racer123</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:28:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-630</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Best scenario is a &#039;383 ci&#039; with a &#039;low rpm ,high tourque RV cam. Tranny must be of an overdrive spec-( some manuals offer more than one level of overdrive). Maximum rpm-mpg ratings are giv&#039;n for big-block R-V&#039;s . Given what you what I&#039;d say if you have an all-aluminum small block pressing through a 6-speed manual overdrive you might achieve what the factory 300hp.,350ci.,t-350, 290 rear axle(non posi) ,factory original &#039;70 Monte Carlo actually did for many years after it was on the road. It always got 22 mpg at 60 mph. Right rear tires had to be replaced at a 3-1 margin compared to the rest. My &#039;71 Lemans got 5 mpg at best with it&#039;s 400hp-455ci.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>Best scenario is a &#8216;383 ci&#8217; with a &#8216;low rpm ,high tourque RV cam. Tranny must be of an overdrive spec-( some manuals offer more than one level of overdrive). Maximum rpm-mpg ratings are giv&#8217;n for big-block R-V&#8217;s . Given what you what I&#8217;d say if you have an all-aluminum small block pressing through a 6-speed manual overdrive you might achieve what the factory 300hp.,350ci.,t-350, 290 rear axle(non posi) ,factory original &#8216;70 Monte Carlo actually did for many years after it was on the road. It always got 22 mpg at 60 mph. Right rear tires had to be replaced at a 3-1 margin compared to the rest. My &#8216;71 Lemans got 5 mpg at best with it&#8217;s 400hp-455ci.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rk O</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link> <dc:creator>Rk O</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-629</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;not good i would say about 9-10 on the 383 and 5-6 on the 502 if you want gas milage drop in a 305 or 327</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>not good i would say about 9-10 on the 383 and 5-6 on the 502 if you want gas milage drop in a 305 or 327</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Surfer</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link> <dc:creator>Surfer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:19:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-628</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;well i have a 1974 nova hatchback and it has a 350 in it and it gets better gas mileage than a 1999 4 cyl. staurn 3 door
i get about 30 miles to the gallon</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>well i have a 1974 nova hatchback and it has a 350 in it and it gets better gas mileage than a 1999 4 cyl. staurn 3 door<br
/> i get about 30 miles to the gallon</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: . W</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link> <dc:creator>. W</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:14:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-627</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;2-4 MPG CITI</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>2-4 MPG CITI</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lodger</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link> <dc:creator>lodger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-626</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;383=15 mpg
502=roughly 10-12
540=buy a gas station................6-8 mpg tops...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>383=15 mpg<br
/> 502=roughly 10-12<br
/> 540=buy a gas station&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.6-8 mpg tops&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chevyraceman_383</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link> <dc:creator>chevyraceman_383</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:08:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-625</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;No way to tell..  It depends on how you build the engine, the VE% of engine, transmission used, gear ratio used, how you drive the car, how hard do push on the throttle..My camaro gets anywhere from 10 to 19 mpg..  If I&#039;m playing around town, alot of hole shots, hard on the throttle, a lot of starting and stopping, etc  I get about 10 MPG...  If I&#039;m steady on the throttle on a long straight road, no shifts needed, no stops... I get around 19 MPG..That&#039;s with a car that runs 11.40&#039;s at 118 mph, 1.60&#039;s 60&#039;... th-400 3 speed trans, 2800 stall, 3.42 gears</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>No way to tell..  It depends on how you build the engine, the VE% of engine, transmission used, gear ratio used, how you drive the car, how hard do push on the throttle..</p><p>My camaro gets anywhere from 10 to 19 mpg..  If I&#8217;m playing around town, alot of hole shots, hard on the throttle, a lot of starting and stopping, etc  I get about 10 MPG&#8230;  If I&#8217;m steady on the throttle on a long straight road, no shifts needed, no stops&#8230; I get around 19 MPG..</p><p>That&#8217;s with a car that runs 11.40&#8217;s at 118 mph, 1.60&#8217;s 60&#8242;&#8230; th-400 3 speed trans, 2800 stall, 3.42 gears</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ssnova197304664</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link> <dc:creator>ssnova197304664</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-624</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;8 to 10 mpg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>8 to 10 mpg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: McLaren</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link> <dc:creator>McLaren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-623</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;It depends on whose crate motors you are talking about, as in what builder.   GM, Shaffiroff, World, etc. and what version of said crate motor.  A 383 with EFI could possibly get over 25 mpg on the highway.  On the other hand a 540 with a Dominator could be under 5 mpg.  The fuel system and valve train combination will determine fuel mileage much more than the displacement.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>It depends on whose crate motors you are talking about, as in what builder.   GM, Shaffiroff, World, etc. and what version of said crate motor.  A 383 with EFI could possibly get over 25 mpg on the highway.  On the other hand a 540 with a Dominator could be under 5 mpg.  The fuel system and valve train combination will determine fuel mileage much more than the displacement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cgriffin1972</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link> <dc:creator>cgriffin1972</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:56:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-622</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I have a 383 steroker in a 85 S10 and I dont get 15MPG with that so I would say about the same for you.The S10 is pretty well emptied of anything un needed for racing.
I still have the exterior looking like stock - but the inside is empty. So it is pretty light weight.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>I have a 383 steroker in a 85 S10 and I dont get 15MPG with that so I would say about the same for you.</p><p> The S10 is pretty well emptied of anything un needed for racing.<br
/> I still have the exterior looking like stock &#8211; but the inside is empty. So it is pretty light weight.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: goat</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link> <dc:creator>goat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:42:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-621</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;yer not putting in a engine that is for economy.. probly 10-12 MPG</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>yer not putting in a engine that is for economy.. probly 10-12 MPG</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gatorade</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link> <dc:creator>gatorade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:01:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-620</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;You&#039;ll be lucky if you get 11mpg in the city.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>You&#8217;ll be lucky if you get 11mpg in the city.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guy L</title><link>http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link> <dc:creator>Guy L</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:57:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.inveighed.com/whats-the-fuel-economy-going-to-be-in-a-67-camaro-2/#comment-619</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;There are to many variables. What rear end are you using? How is your carb tuned. Did you go with EFI. If so what injectors did you use?Assuming you have or are spec&#039;ing out a performance car. I will compair it to my Nova.383 535HP
4:10 Locking rear diff
Built turbo 350 auto
6mpg in towm
11mpg hwy12.14 quarter on premium pump gas</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href=""></a></p><p>There are to many variables. What rear end are you using? How is your carb tuned. Did you go with EFI. If so what injectors did you use?</p><p>Assuming you have or are spec&#8217;ing out a performance car. I will compair it to my Nova.</p><p>383 535HP<br
/> 4:10 Locking rear diff<br
/> Built turbo 350 auto<br
/> 6mpg in towm<br
/> 11mpg hwy</p><p>12.14 quarter on premium pump gas</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/19 queries in 0.046 seconds using disk

Served from: home.detritushq.com @ 2010-09-10 18:56:12 -->