What’s the fuel economy going to be in a ‘67 Camaro?

by admin on June 30, 2010



What’s the fuel economy in my 1967 Camaro going to be if I drop a 383 ci, 502 ci, or a 540 ci crate engine in it? Anybody have any specs on any of the engines perhaps in another car, or fuel economy numbers for them?

Originally posted 2009-04-18 00:44:04.

No related posts.

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

Al Capone April 18, 2009 at 11:21 pm

I have a ‘69 Cuda with a holley 4barrel and a 360, I average 15 mpg in the city and approx. 18-20 on the highway.

AgsFan April 21, 2009 at 5:19 am

Well, Mike…part of this equation depends on just how hard and fast you drive it! If you accelerate and decelerate slowly, I’d say you will be fortunate to get 18 mpg on the highway. Perhaps you might fare better; especially if you install a really good wire set and premium spark plugs.. like Bosch Plus 4.

Guy L April 23, 2009 at 12:57 pm

There are to many variables. What rear end are you using? How is your carb tuned. Did you go with EFI. If so what injectors did you use?

Assuming you have or are spec’ing out a performance car. I will compair it to my Nova.

383 535HP
4:10 Locking rear diff
Built turbo 350 auto
6mpg in towm
11mpg hwy

12.14 quarter on premium pump gas

gatorade April 24, 2009 at 12:01 am

You’ll be lucky if you get 11mpg in the city.

goat April 27, 2009 at 10:42 am

yer not putting in a engine that is for economy.. probly 10-12 MPG

cgriffin1972 April 28, 2009 at 10:56 pm

I have a 383 steroker in a 85 S10 and I dont get 15MPG with that so I would say about the same for you.

The S10 is pretty well emptied of anything un needed for racing.
I still have the exterior looking like stock – but the inside is empty. So it is pretty light weight.

McLaren May 2, 2009 at 7:49 am

It depends on whose crate motors you are talking about, as in what builder. GM, Shaffiroff, World, etc. and what version of said crate motor. A 383 with EFI could possibly get over 25 mpg on the highway. On the other hand a 540 with a Dominator could be under 5 mpg. The fuel system and valve train combination will determine fuel mileage much more than the displacement.

ssnova197304664 May 5, 2009 at 3:23 pm

8 to 10 mpg

chevyraceman_383 May 5, 2009 at 5:08 pm

No way to tell.. It depends on how you build the engine, the VE% of engine, transmission used, gear ratio used, how you drive the car, how hard do push on the throttle..

My camaro gets anywhere from 10 to 19 mpg.. If I’m playing around town, alot of hole shots, hard on the throttle, a lot of starting and stopping, etc I get about 10 MPG… If I’m steady on the throttle on a long straight road, no shifts needed, no stops… I get around 19 MPG..

That’s with a car that runs 11.40’s at 118 mph, 1.60’s 60′… th-400 3 speed trans, 2800 stall, 3.42 gears

lodger May 8, 2009 at 5:39 pm

383=15 mpg
502=roughly 10-12
540=buy a gas station…………….6-8 mpg tops…

. W May 11, 2009 at 9:14 pm

2-4 MPG CITI

Surfer May 14, 2009 at 4:19 am

well i have a 1974 nova hatchback and it has a 350 in it and it gets better gas mileage than a 1999 4 cyl. staurn 3 door
i get about 30 miles to the gallon

Rk O May 17, 2009 at 10:41 am

not good i would say about 9-10 on the 383 and 5-6 on the 502 if you want gas milage drop in a 305 or 327

racer123 May 18, 2009 at 1:28 am

Best scenario is a ‘383 ci’ with a ‘low rpm ,high tourque RV cam. Tranny must be of an overdrive spec-( some manuals offer more than one level of overdrive). Maximum rpm-mpg ratings are giv’n for big-block R-V’s . Given what you what I’d say if you have an all-aluminum small block pressing through a 6-speed manual overdrive you might achieve what the factory 300hp.,350ci.,t-350, 290 rear axle(non posi) ,factory original ‘70 Monte Carlo actually did for many years after it was on the road. It always got 22 mpg at 60 mph. Right rear tires had to be replaced at a 3-1 margin compared to the rest. My ‘71 Lemans got 5 mpg at best with it’s 400hp-455ci.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: